Quantcast
Channel: Ubuntu Forums - Installation & Upgrades
Viewing all 26379 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

[server] Configuring LVM shares

May 15, 2020, 11:28 am
$
0
0
I have a Dell T320 Server. It is running on a RAID 10 disk array with LVM. I am trying to mount shares in Ubuntu 20.04
I am trying to set up a server for rebuilding my home network. I have Ubuntu 20.04 booting with the following drive setup:
Dell T320 Server
sudo fdisk -l
Disk /dev/loop0: 89.1 MiB, 93417472 bytes, 182456 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop1: 38.7 MiB, 40583168 bytes, 79264 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop2: 93.9 MiB, 98484224 bytes, 192352 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/loop3: 9.1 MiB, 9510912 bytes, 18576 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/sda: 3.7 TiB, 3998614552576 bytes, 7809794048 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disk label type: gpt
Disk identifier: 926321AB-FFBB-44F1-91CA-C1ACDD4C4A5D

Device Start End Sectors Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 10506231 1048576 512M EFI System
/dev/sda2 1050624 3147775 2097152 1G Linux filesystem
/dev/sda3 3147776 7809791999 7806644224 3.7T Linux filesystem

Disk /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu-lv: 4 GiB, 4294967296 bytes, 8388608 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-LV1: 200 GiB, 214748364800 bytes, 419430400 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

Disk /dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-LV2: 300 GiB, 322122547200 bytes, 129145600 sectors
Units: Sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes

sudo blkid
/dev/sda1: UUID=”xxxx-xxxx” TYPE=”vfat” PARTUUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx”
/dev/sda2: UUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx” TYPE=”ext4”PARTLABEL=”UbuntuLTS”
PARTUUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx”
/dev/sda3: UUID=”xxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxx” TYPE=”LVM2_member”
PARTLABEL=”shares” PARTUUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx”
/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv: UUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx” TYPE=”ext4”
/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-LV1: UUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx” TYPE=”ext4”
/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-LV2: UUID=”xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxxx” TYPE=”ext4”
/dev/loop0: TYPE=”squashfs”
/dev/loop1: TYPE=”squashfs”
/dev/loop1: TYPE=”squashfs”
/dev/loop3: TYPE=”squashfs”

cat /etc/fstab
# /etc/fstab: static file system information
. . .
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
# was on /dev/ubuntu-vg/ubuntu-lv during curtain installation
/dev/disk/by-id/dm-uuid-LVM-xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx / ext4 defaults 0 0
# boot was on /dev/sda2 during curtain installation
/dev/disk/by uuid/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx /boot ext4 defaults 0 0
# /boot/efi was on /dev/sda1 during curtain installation
/dev/disk/by uuid/xxxxxxxxxx /boot/efi vfat defaults 0 0
/swap.img none swap sw 0 0

My question is: “Why can’t I see the LV1 and LV2 shares? Do I need to add something else to fstab?”
↧
Search

New Ubuntu install, first boot, Grub> Directory encrypted

May 15, 2020, 1:43 pm
$
0
0
Just installed vers 20.04, found the following:

1) Installer crashes if ZFS is selected. It gets to the screen asking for user name and crashes when one begins to the computer name. tried several times.
Then installed without any advanced option. No ZFS, no LVM. Removed DVD for reboot nand ...

2) Grub errors out saying "Directory encrypted. Entering recovery mode".

I'm trying again with ZFS but installing on sdb instead of sda. I'll update later.

Any guesses what's happening ?

Thanks for any suggestions,
Gene

Update: Install attempt on sdb failed as well. Note that this dvd was used to successfully install on another system WITH ZFS.
↧
↧

[ubuntu] Bootable USB Doesn't Work on New PC

May 15, 2020, 2:48 pm
$
0
0
The motherboard on my old PC fried so I bought a new one. The old one was running ubuntu 16.04 on a bootable USB thumbdrive. When I start it on the new PC, it boots into maintenance mode. I thought running update-initramfs might help but it didn't. I'm at a loss.

Here's the output from journalctl -xb:

https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/scfKRnB6YP/

Any help will be greatly appreciated.
↧

Triple boot issue (Win10+Ubuntu+Elementary)

May 15, 2020, 3:07 pm
$
0
0
Hi I have win10 on my SSD drive. In place of blu ray drive I have a hard disk mounted 1TB. I wanted to use this disk for various linux distributions. And so I have installed elementary OS and then Ubuntu using option: "Install Ubuntu alongside Elementary". Default options. Next I divided the disk partition about 50% for Ubuntu and Elementary. After all the grub bootloader doesn't start. Win10 automatically turns on. The only solution I figured out is to change boot order (Ubuntu before Windows Boot Manager), then grub starts but I can only choose between Ubuntu and Elementary. Is it possible to have 3 OSes in this way? And what to do to be able to choose between 3 different OSes in one bootloader?
↧

upgraded to 20.04 - software is gone and I can't get it back

May 16, 2020, 6:12 am
$
0
0
Hi Folks! I use a lot of tagging software and it's fairly important to me. I just upgraded to 20.04 and I've noticed a few things that I had before are missing, and I can't figure out how to get them back.

Puddletag
PyRenamer
UMPlayer

When I run apt update:

Hit:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/deb stable InRelease
Hit:2 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:4 http://ppa.launchpad.net/graphics-drivers/ppa/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-updates InRelease
Hit:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-backports InRelease
Hit:7 http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/ppa/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security InRelease
Hit:9 http://ppa.launchpad.net/lutris-team/lutris/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:10 http://ppa.launchpad.net/nilarimogard/webupd8/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:11 http://ppa.launchpad.net/stebbins/ha...eleases/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:12 http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu focal InRelease
Hit:13 http://ppa.launchpad.net/videolan/stable-daily/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:14 http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/nemo/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Hit:15 http://ppa.launchpad.net/webupd8team/puddletag/ubuntu xenial InRelease
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
All packages are up to date.

As you can see, I had to use old releases on some of these.

When I try to install Puddletag I get:

sudo apt-get install puddletag
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies:
puddletag : Depends: python-mutagen (>= 1.14) but it is not installable
Depends: python-qt4 (>= 4.5) but it is not installable
Depends: python-configobj (>= 4.5) but it is not installable
Depends: python-audioread but it is not installable
Depends: python-acoustid but it is not installable
Recommends: libchromaprint-tools but it is not going to be installed
Recommends: python-levenshtein but it is not installable
Recommends: python-mysqldb but it is not installable
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

PyRenamer just gives me:

sudo apt-get install pyrenamer
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Package pyrenamer is not available, but is referred to by another package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source


E: Package 'pyrenamer' has no installation candidate

Similar thing with Umplayer.

Any ideas how I can get these back? Ho do I prevent this from happening on the next upgrade? Thank you so much!
↧
↧

Unable to boot XUbuntu after installation

May 16, 2020, 6:34 am
$
0
0
I am trying to install Ubuntu 14.04 on a Fujitsu Futro S400 Thin Client computer. The specifications are as follows:

CPU AMD Geode NX 1500 1GHZ 32 bit (Similar to Athlon XP-M)
Chipset SIS741GX
RAM 896MB(1GB)
Embedded Graphic card SIS Mirage 128MB (Shared from RAM)
Compact Flash 32GB that works as IDE HDD

The 32GB Compact Flash already have Windows 98 on a 16GB FAT32 partition. I want to use the other 16GB to install Ubuntu and have a dual boot option.

I boot the XUbuntu Live Image from a USB drive and I can do the installation with no problems. But when I reboot it shows the grub error:

error: unknown filesystem. grub rescue>

If I do "ls" I can see two partitions, msdos1 and msdos2 on hd0. If I do "ls (hd0,msdos1)" and "ls(hd0,msdos2)" it show "unknow filesystem" for both.

I have reinstalled with different partition options xfs+swap, ext4 + swap, ext2 + swap, etx2 without swap. Grub is always installed to sda option. But I obtain the same error always.

I have tried with boot-repair live usb, and repaired it with different options like "purge grub", "legacy grub", "update grub to the last version". All options finish correctly but when I reboot i have the same error again.

If I boot with the XUbuntu live cd after installation with the "Try XUbuntu" option I can mount and see all the partitions correctly with GParted. And when I reinstall the installer can see the previous installation.

I don't know what more to try. I am thinking to try replacing grub by lilo, but I prefer grub.

I have choosen 14.04 because 16 and 18 crash at installation to busybox. I think that my computer is too old for that versions, but I am ok if I can install 14.04.

Thanks and sorry for my bad english.
↧

Ubuntu 20.04 / Kubuntu 20.04 live/usb both crash during startup, see pic

May 16, 2020, 5:04 pm
$
0
0
Hi, long time Linux user here. Just build a new rig with a Ryzen 3950x, RTX 2080 Super, 32 GB Ram, 2x 1TB Evo Plus SSD.
I'm running Manjaro on it but as I cannot get any BT device (headphone, soundbar, phone) to connect I thought to try Ubuntu or Kubuntu live to see if they do connect.

Burned an USB but as soon as I select Ubuntu in grub it goes all belly up, see pic, and install hangs.

I can see something about nouveau driver so I thought I start up in low res mode and then I do get to the desktop.
Has this problem occured before? I have googled and tinkered the whole evening but no luck...

Basically I want to know if I can install Euter Ubuntu or Kubuntu after having started low-res, install the nvidia 440x drivers as these perform good on Manjaro.
Thanks for any advice or tips.

https://pasteboard.co/J8HZhtW.jpg
↧

[kubuntu] 20.04 ISO image always gets checked

May 17, 2020, 11:56 am
$
0
0
I don't recall this happening in any distributions before this one. I downloaded a 20.04 ISO image and installed it on a USB device. Every time I boot from it I need to wait a couple of minutes while it checks the integrity of the files on the installation medium. Is there a way to thwart this? I've installed this image at least three or four times now, and I know it's intact.
↧
Search

Ubuntu 20.04 not work lock screen after update

May 17, 2020, 5:37 pm
$
0
0
I had Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and I upgraded to 20.04. The lock screen to ask password after some time it was working perfectly. After the upgrade stopped working. I tried to go to Ubuntu settings and check if it’s enabled and yes is enabled to lock screen ifor 5 minutes but the screen is never locked again after the upgrade. Any idea how to fix it?

Thank you
↧
↧

[ubuntu] Problems installing 18.04.4 on a Dell Latitude 7400

May 18, 2020, 12:24 am
$
0
0
I bought a Dell Latitude 7400 with pre-installed Ubuntu 18.04.4 in January.

The first boot is good, but as soon as a "Software Update" updates software and kernel, there are problems. It does not boot anymore reliably and does not wake up from hibernation reliably. When booting, it stops with a flat reddish screen. When booting from the grub selection menu, it prints "Loading initial ramdisk" and that was it.

The behaviour seems to be associated with the update of the kernel and/or grub.

I tried various ways to boot the machine, none is reliable. It may boot a couple of times, but then not for a couple of days.

Dell says the machine is okay and the internal hardware tests do not find any issues.

I also tried other Linux flavours such as Suse and Fedora, it is always the same: It boots until the software is updated, then it is a lottery game whether it wakes up or boots.

The only way to work with it might be to inhibit any kernel and grub update (have not tried for more than a couple of days though, and updating is important for security and other reasons).

Any ideas?
↧

[ubuntu] Unable to boot to Ubuntu after upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04 LTS

May 18, 2020, 1:53 am
$
0
0
I upgraded Ubuntu to 20.04 LTS on a machine with dual boot (Windows 10 & Ubuntu).
OS upgrade was at the last stage showing a message related to boot security with some text.

At that point I couldn't progress further.

After rebooting the machine I couldn't boot to Ubuntu (windows 10 boot is OK)

I changed my EFI setting to disable boot security but still couldn't boot from the Grub menu and recover also failed.

I started Ubuntu from USB and attempted re-installation which found a missing boot partition.

I ran the boot-repair tool from Ubuntu loaded from a USB with the tool's report at https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/w29vy4kdYy/

My question is based on the report from the boot-repair tool should I go ahead with the tool recommendation or do something else to repair and enable booting to Ubuntu?

Note that my Windows 10 boot works OK from Grub and it looks like my upgraded Ubuntu partition is OK

Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Regards!
↧

Mini ISO.

May 18, 2020, 5:45 am
$
0
0
Will there be a mini iso for Ubuntu 20.04.

Henry
↧

[lubuntu] install lubuntu 20.04 (currently using 18.04.4 dual boot with windows 10 )

May 18, 2020, 8:23 am
$
0
0
Hello,

I've been using lubuntu 18.04.4 on X1 Carbon (7th gen), and would like to install lubuntu 20.04. But I'd like to keep my current setting for the dual boot with Windows 10 (currently using GRUB 2.02-2ubuntu8.15). Also, currently, I ahve

What should I pay attention to during the installation? Are there any "do's" and "don'ts" that I should bear in mind?

Thanks in advance!
↧
↧

Nautilus copy of .xcf file thumbnail is empty

May 18, 2020, 12:46 pm
$
0
0
I have a folder with an .xcf (GIMP) image, the image has a correct thumbnail in the nautilus window. When I copy (cut+paste) the image in the same folder the thumbnail is empty.
If I copy the image from a different folder the thumbnail shows the logo of GIMP.
In both cases the thumbnail is WRONG.
Doing the same with a .jpg or .png image the thumbnails are correct.
The same problem happens in Ubuntu 20.04 and 20.10

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+s...s/+bug/1879330
Attached Images
↧

Trying to change group ownership of a drive

May 19, 2020, 1:02 am
$
0
0
I have recently installed Ubuntu 20.04LTE on aToshiba laptop

I have two NTFS drives in addition to the Ubuntu partitions. I find that root has group ownership of the drives, for example:-

ls -l /media/MMData
total 120
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 0 May 4 18:33 '$RECYCLE.BIN'
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 32768 May 18 09:20 AudioBooks
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 8192 May 14 20:01 Malcolm
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 4096 May 4 18:49 Marian
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 32768 Nov 14 2019 mp3Music
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 45056 Jun 3 2020 Music
drwxrwxrwx 1 malcolm root 0 May 11 12:49 'System Volume Information'


This is causing problems of programs being unable to access files. I tried to change the group ownership by using:-

sudo chgrp -R malcolm /media/MMData

Group ownership did not change.

The fstab file is as follows (my user id is 1000):-


# /etc/fstab: static file system information.
#
# Use 'blkid' to print the universally unique identifier for a
# device; this may be used with UUID= as a more robust way to name devices
# that works even if disks are added and removed. See fstab(5).
#
# <file system> <mount point> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
# / was on /dev/sda5 during installation
UUID=e228379f-272a-4784-8726-9abecd0b86ae / ext4 errors=remount-ro 0 1
# /boot/efi was on /dev/sda2 during installation
UUID=3E5E-44D0 /boot/efi vfat umask=0077 0 1
UUID=32A04290A0425A8D /media/MMData ntfs-3g defaults,locale=en_GB.utf8,uid=1000 0 0
UUID=5CC26B8DC26B69EA /media/Win1064 ntfs-3g defaults,locale=en_GB.utf8,uid=1000 0 0
/swapfile none swap sw 0 0


How can group ownership of a drive be changed? Your assistance would be appreciated. Thanks.
↧
Search

[ubuntu] after upgrade to 20.04 dual boot, grub missing can't access windows 8.1

May 19, 2020, 5:50 am
$
0
0
I haven't used Ubuntu in about 8 years, so I'm pretty much a newbie again. I hope I am posting this in the correct place.

I installed Ubuntu 18.0 4 using a bootable usb. Seemed to work fine except for an error that would come up.

Error stated: An issue has been detected- Cancel/Report Now?

I reported the issue a couple of times. It never told me what exactly was wrong.

I decided to upgrade to 20.04. I downloaded the new iso and updated my bootable usb. I used the stick to boot up my laptop to try 20.04. Everything seemed to work fine, so I proceeded to upgrade to 20.04. After the installation was complete, the computer rebooted and went straight into windows 8.1 without showing the grub.

A friend of mine suggested this, so I used the following link to see if I could fix the issue: https://itsfoss.com/no-grub-windows-linux/
In my windows command prompt I entered the following: bcdedit /set {bootmgr} path \EFI\ubuntu\grubx64.efi
The command line showed that the boot manager had been updated.
I restarted the computer and got the following message: System BootOrder not found. Initializing defaults.
The laptop will now start into Ubuntu, but the grub does not come up and give me the option to boot into windows.

This is the information that I know about my computer:
Toshiba Satelite C55-A
Intel core i3
Was originally installed with Windows 8.1 Home and worked fine with 18.04.

Please let me know what information you need from me to help you help me.

Thanks
↧

[ubuntu] Need Thunderbird 68.8 for Ubuntu 20.04 arm

May 19, 2020, 8:04 am
$
0
0
I am trying to migrate from Arch Linux ARM 4.19 to Ubuntu 20.04 RPi for my desktop but the Ubuntu Thunderbird version is 68.7 and I cannot open the Arch Thunderbird 68.8 version profile (.thunderbird). Is there a way to get notification when this version is available? I tried Mozilla forum but it is too Firefox oriented and little support from Thunderbird, at least from what I could search and learn. Any suggestions greatly appreciated. I look forward some day to migrate Thunderbird so I can start using Ubuntu for my RPi4B desktop!
↧
↧

Installing 20.04 to USB: Needs EFI Partition

May 19, 2020, 11:29 am
$
0
0
I wanted to install 20.04 onto a USB thumbdrive (worked with 16.04). The installation stopped with a message that the thumbdrive (the same one I installed 16.04 on) needed an EFI partition. I wish I knew how to add one. The "best" solution I could come up with was using the Windows diskpart utility, but when I tried it, it made the entire disk an EFI partition and gparted says it's ext4. Everything I've read says it should be FAT32.

I'm wondering why the 20.04 installation doesn't make the partition instead of just stopping and leaving me hanging.
↧

Ubuntu boots into Busybox (DualBoot)

May 19, 2020, 12:35 pm
$
0
0
Hey guys,

I am a total Ubuntu beginner. Today I wanted to set up a dual boot on my 7 month-old Dell laptop. After disabling RTS in the BIOS and also turning off the Bitlock encryption with Windows Power-Shell i was able to finish the installation. Then i restarted my laptop, reenabled RTS in the BIOS and was able to boot windows again (which was why i reenabled it in the first place, because without it windows wouldnt boot). When i tried to boot Ubuntu it always booted into the Busybox. I attached an image with the message i got. Im pretty helpless because i dont know what to do. I really need that for university, i dont want to use a VM, its just too laggy and inconvenient.
Here is a link to the picture: https://imgur.com/a/apZ91Uk
I hope that someone can help me with this.
Attached Images
↧

[xubuntu] Suspend hangs for 30 to 40 seconds before going to sleep

May 19, 2020, 12:47 pm
$
0
0
I just spent the weekend upgrading my lap top from v14. to v20.04.

I did a fresh install, after backing up my /home and re-partitioning the drive.

I also completely deleted the dual boot with Win10. I found that I never use that system anymore. My one Windows program I need is run in a virtual machine.

Boots fine, everything works. Have reinstalled all the software I use. I restored my backup. I am happy with the system . . . except . . . .

When I put the system in suspend mode, it hangs for about 30 to 40 seconds before it goes to sleep. It never did that with the older version of Xubuntu.

I did some digging and tweaking. I found that if I "log out" before I suspend, then it goes to sleep almost instantly. So it had to do with something that started after I logged in.

I used "Session and Startup" to disable all my start services on log in, but it had no effect. I rebooted and still got the same hang time. I re-enabled the services and started looking elsewhere.

Here is an extract from the log file:

[114250.960519] mce: [Firmware Bug]: cpu 1, failed to setup threshold interrupt for bank 4, block 1 (MSRC0000408=0xc008000001000000)
[114257.054884] [drm:atom_op_jump [radeon]] *ERROR* atombios stuck in loop for more than 5secs aborting
[114257.054907] [drm;atom_execute_table_locked [radeon]] *ERROR* atombios stuck executing E89A (len 498, WS 0, PS 4) @ oxE8DB
[117457.375048] [Firmware Bug]: cpu 0, try to use APIC500 (LVT offset 0) for vector 0xf9, but the register is already in use for vector 0x400 on another cpu

This, and very similar entries, loop several times when the system is put into suspend.

A search brought me to Launchpad which had a bug report that predated my v14 install!

I ran "apt-get upgrade" and it upgraded some of my system, but the hang time still persists.

This led me to believe that my problem was with the Radeon video driver. When I went to "Additional Drivers", there were none listed, and after a search it said that no drivers were available.

Here is the output for sudo lshw -c video

*-display
description: VGA compatible controller
product: RS880M [Mobility Radeon HD 4225/4250]
vendor: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI]
physical id: 5
bus info: pci@0000:01:05.0
version: 00
width: 32 bits
clock: 33MHz
capabilities: pm msi vga_controller bus_master cap_list rom
configuration: driver=radeon latency=0
resources: irq:18 memory:c0000000-cfffffff ioport:9000(size=256) memory:d0100000-d010ffff memory:d0000000-d00fffff memory:c0000-dffff

I downloaded the ATI drivers from their website for ATI Mobility Radeon HD4250 and ran the install script.
Here is the result:

error: Detected X Server version 'XServer _64a' is not supported. Supported versions are X.Org 6.9 or later, up to XServer 1.10 (default:v2:86_64:lib32:XServer _64a:none:5.4.0-31-generic: )
Installation will not proceed.

Has anyone else had this issue, and if so, did you find a fix?

Cheers!

Naught
↧
Viewing all 26379 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>