Quantcast
Channel: Ubuntu Forums - Installation & Upgrades
Viewing all 26379 articles
Browse latest View live

[ubuntu] Install Compendium in Ubuntu

$
0
0
I am relatively new to Ubuntu but have been doing all I can to learn using the available documentation, but have run up against a problem.
I am trying to install Compendium, and it seems straigtforward:
http://compendium.open.ac.uk/institu...re/ReadMe.html

"Once you have downloaded the relevant .tar file from the compendiuminstitute.org website, simply unpack it.You can run Compendium by navigating to the Compendium directory and typing: ./compendium.sh"

Reality is rather different.

I've been trying to follow the steps set out here: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CompilingEasyHowTo


But can't get step 2 to work.

Any advice would be gratefully appreciated.

Thanks

[ubuntu] howto get how many packages are still to go to install within apt-get dist- upgrade

$
0
0
Hi,

I am interesting in to find out how many packages, within running installation process, are still have to be installed and / or upgraded, in terminal ?
if is running apt-get upgrade or apt-get dist-upgrade I would like to know how many packages are still going to be installed and / or upgraded or have been installed / upgraded ?
Is it possible to count it by some command or somebody have some hint - (in man apt-get I did not find some) ?
(It does not have to be counted precisely, just approximately - lets say plus/minus ten packages in tolerance in that specific moment of progress.)

thank you,
kind regards,
M.

[ubuntu] Problem installing Ubuntu on new Hard-Drive via USB

$
0
0
Hi All,

First post on here, so apologies if I'm bringing up a problem already solved - if so, please do point me in the right direction.

My old hard-drive seems to have stopped working - it's given me the blue screen of death. I had partitioned it previously and was running Windows 7 and Ubuntu. I've since installed a new 1TB Western Digital hard-drive, which BIOS seems to recognize. However, when I try to install Ubuntu via USB, it does not seem to find a hard-drive! It 'works' so to speak up until that point, in as much as Ubuntu loads, and I can run it off the USB drive, but when I try to install it, it says I am connected to the internet, which is one requirement for installation, but the other - having 4GB of space - has a big red cross next to it!

Any ideas? Many, many thanks in advance.

[ubuntu] When open WebEx sound doesn't work

$
0
0
When we logs to WebEx account, Systems sound is not works. Not able to listen.
In other applications we could able to listen or talk. e.g. Skype

[ubuntu] Full disk encryption on three drives 13.04

$
0
0
I have right now followed this guide http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1782296 and have my three hard drives in one lvm then split into home, root, and swap groups like in the tutorial from above. I am trying to use the full disk encryption option on the graphical install of 13.04 but when ever it try's to boot into the cd I get to pick my language and it just hangs there after clicking continue. I know I can use luks to encrypt then decrypt and install on that which might have to be an option I was just wondering if anyone had any advice on a best possible solution to encrypting the hard drisks on a ubuntu install? Using 12.10 is also not an option since it does not play nice with my video card.

[ubuntu] Configure warnings installing XOOPIC from Berkeley Plasma Physics Group

$
0
0
I downloaded and unpacked the sources, Then I established the dependancies with Linux sudo command according to the following README.INSTALL.
Quote:

XOOPIC source is available via www at http://langmuir.eecs.berkeley.edu/pub/codes

Most if this file is old, but here is the quickstart. Read on if you have trouble.
: This is a standard ./configure, make, make install system.
: start with the script 'run_conf.sh' - it is a nicer way to pass arguments to configure
and it is the same for xoopic and xgrafix (you need to install xgrafix first)
: once you have edited run_conf.sh to fit your needs, use it to configure xgrafix, then install it:
$> sh run_conf.sh
$> make && sudo make install # note only sudo if you need root privileges to write the destination
: then once that completes, use _the same_ run_conf.sh to configure xoopic:
$> sh run_conf.sh
$> make && cp xg/xoopic /path/to/where/I/want/xoopic

That should do it!

bash_completion generally has nice tab completion for introspection of available options to configure
($>./configure<tab><tab> will show your options)

############################
# Dependencies:
############################
building and running xgrafix/xoopic depend on the following headers/libraries/programs:
X11, Xpm, Tcl/Tk, gcc, imagemagick, bison

optional xoopic dependencies:
Fortran
MPI for parallel runs
HDF5 for parallel or high performance dump files
libpng for png diagnostics
fftw
fftw3


dependencies can be installed on Ubuntu (or likely any Debian based distro) with the command:
sudo aptitude install gcc g++ gfortran build-essential automake \
tk-dev imagemagick bison libx11-dev libxpm-dev libpng-dev \
fftw-dev libfftw3-dev h5utils hdf5-tools libhdf5-serial-*\

the first two lines are necessary, the last installs optional fftw/hdf5 dependencies

On Fedora, these dependencies can be installed with:
sudo yum install gcc gcc-gfortran gcc-c++ automake libX11-devel libXpm-devel \
ImageMagick bison tk-devel libpng-devel \
hdf5 hdf5-devel

On SUSE, install the following packages with your package manager:
gcc gcc-c++ gcc-fortran automake xorg-x11-devel make
tk-devel bison libpng-devel imagemagick hdf5 hdf5-devel


##################
# Configure / build/ install
##################
For a new install:

edit the run_conf.sh file to match your system. For a basic install, the only
thing you are likely to edit is `prefix` - the install location.

then you can do:
sh run_conf.sh # configure the build

make # build the program
# or, if you have a multiprocessor machine, this can go faster with:
make -j 4 #(that's 4 threads, you can do as many or as few as you want)

# If you are building xgrafix, do:
make install # sudo make install if you need root privileges to write to $prefix/{bin|lib|include}

test the xgrafix build with:
./ctest/xtest # from the xgrafix root dir.

Once you have built and installed xgrafix, you can build xoopic. run_conf.sh is the same for
both xoopic and xgrafix, so if you configured run_conf.sh in xgrafix, use the same one in xoopic.

The process to build xoopic is the same as xgrafix, except skip the 'make install' step, since you only
need the binary file in 'xg/xoopic'. You can test xoopic with:
./xoopic -i input/ebeam1a.inp # from the xoopic root dir

once xoopic is done, you can install it with:
cp xoopic $prefix/bin/

note that you do not need to do 'make install' for xoopic, just place the binary './xoopic' anywhere in your path

where prefix is defined as in:
prefix=/usr/local # to install for all users
or
prefix=$HOME # to install just for you (assuming ~/bin is already in your path)

**************************************
The rest of this file is pretty old...

XOOPIC has been compiled successfully on the following UNIX systems running
X11R5 or better:

OS Machine compiler library
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
HP-UX A.09.05 HP 712/80 g++2.7.2 libg++2.7.1
DEC UNIX 3.2 DEC 200/4/233 g++2.7.2 libg++2.7.1
DEC UNIX 3.2 DEC 200/4/233 CXX5.1 vendor supplied
using DEC CXX 5.1 is not recommended for XOOPIC
DEC UNIX 4.0C PWS 600AU g++2.8.0 libg++2.8.0
DEC UNIX 4.0C PWS 600AU egcs-1.0.1 egcs libraries
DEC UNIX 4.0C PWS 600AU CXX6.0 vendor supplied.
DEC UNIX 4.0D PWS 600AU CXX6.0 vendor supplied.
DEC UNIX 4.0D DEC 8400 CXX6.0 vendor supplied.
SunOS 4.1.x Sparc 2 g++2.7.2 libg++2.7.1
Solaris 2.5 UltraSPARC g++2.7.2
Solaris 2.6 UltraSPARC Sun CC 4.2 vendor supplied
AIX 3.2 IBM 590 g++2.7.2 libg++2.7.1
AIX 3.2 IBM 590 xlC 1.00 -- had to modify the code,
and turn off optimization on some
files. Furthermore, the compiled
code was 1/2 as fast as g++.
Solaris 2.4 Sparc 10 Sun c++4.0.1
(required a few simple changes)

Linux PPro g++2.7.2, g++2.8.0
Linux/Alpha 21164 g++2.7.2, g++2.8.0
FreeBSD K6 g++2.7.2
-- Most of this is outdated, but 2009 versions have been compiled on the following:
both 32/64 bit:
Ubuntu Linux 8.10 - 9.10, gcc 4.2-4.4, tcl/tk 8.4-8.5
Mac OSX 10.4.8,10.5.7,10.6.1 - using MacPorts or Fink for tcl/tk
Fedora Core 8 (64) - gcc4.1
Fedora Core 11 (32) - gcc4.4
openSUSE 11 (32) - gcc4.3

************************************************** **************************
If possible ENLIST THE AID OF YOUR SYSTEM ADMINISTRATOR FOR COMPILING XOOPIC.

WARNING: g++ 2.6.1, g++ 2.6.2, and g++ 2.6.3 are BROKEN and WILL NOT
compile XOOPIC (on most systems). I don't know about previous versions.

ALSO: g++2.7.2 on Windows NT 4.0 does NOT work.
************************************************** **************************




The rest of this file is possibly outdated:
**********
To compile and install XOOPIC, you need the following public domain
software packages which we do not maintain:


* g++ (/pub/GNU/gcc-2.7.2.tar.gz at gatekeeper.dec.com)
* libg++ (/pub/GNU/libg++-2.7.?.tar.gz at gatekeeper.dec.com)

OR DEC CXX instead of g++ and libg++

* libtcl7.4.a (or later)
* libtk4.0.a (or later)
* libXpm.a
* libXGrafix2.50 (or later) (http://ptsg.eecs.berkeley.edu)

*************************************************
*** NOTE: Requirement for the XGrafix version ***
*************************************************
Update on Aug. 16, 2005 by H.C. KIM

To make this version of xoopic work properly, the recent version
of XGrafix (later than Mar. 29, 2005) needs to be installed.
Otherwise, you may see "core dumped" when restoring from a dump file.
*************************************************

Once you have a c++ compiler, libtcl.a libtk.a libXpm.a, you are ready to
begin:

0) Get the sources:
http://ptsg.eecs.berkeley.edu

You may already have these and can omit this step.

1) Unpack the sources:
>tar -xvzf xoopic.tar.gz

You should get a directory named oopic with these files:
README Makefile physics/ advisor/ xg/ xgrafix/ input/ g++-fixes/ doc/
configure
physics/ contains the basic physical models for XOOPIC
advisor/ contains the input file reader and input sanity checking
xgrafix/ contains the graphics library used by XOOPIC
input/ contains sample input files for XOOPIC
g++-fixes/ contains any fixes you may need to make to g++ to get
it to work
doc/ contains documentation.
bench/ benchmarks of XOOPIC
+ other misc. files..

2) Compile and install XGrafix.
(XGrafix has its own instructions)

3) Run ./configure

Once you have a c++ compiler, libXGC250.a, libXpm.a, libtcl*.a, libtk*.a,
you are ready to start compiling xoopic.

To begin, run "configure", which will try to find all the libraries
and headers needed, and which will accept parameters indicating
configuration options or library locations.

In the directory where you have:
README Makefile physics/ advisor/ xg/ xgrafix/ input/

./configure

Pay attention to the messages configure gives. If it fails to
automatically find something such as libXpm.a, it will prompt
you to tell it where to find that file.

configure --help
will give you a list of configure options.

As an example, this command will cause XOOPIC to use the compiler
'cxx' instead of the default 'g++':

./configure --with-CXX=cxx

If HDF5 library is not installed in your systems,
you need to give an option of '--disable-hdf5':

./configure --disable-hdf5

Depending on how idiosyncratic your system installation is, you
might have to give a very complex configure comand such as:

./configure --with-CXX=cxx --with-tclsh=/home/tcl/bin
--x-includes=/usr/X11/include --x-libraries=/sww/X11/lib
--with-xpm=/usr/local/Xpm/lib --with-XGRAFIX-lib=/usr/local/tmp

However, that should only be necessary if your system administrator
likes to install things in non-standard locations.

Configure, when successful, should convert Makefile.in in each of
. advisor/ physics/ and xg/ and convert them to a Makefile.

4) Run make

make

This should go into each of physics/ advisor/, and xg/,
and create the binary xg/xoopic for you.

If the compile fails, complaining of missing include files
or libraries, try editing */Makefile to add the appropriate
includes or libraries.

If the link fails with missing symbols, it is likely that
the version of tcl/tk that XOOPIC is trying to use is a
mismatch to the XGrafix library. XGrafix must be configured
to use either version 7.4/4.0 of the tcl/tk libraries,
or configured to use version 7.5/4.1 or higher. If
XGrafix was configured for the wrong tcl/tk libraries,
then XOOPIC won't link!

Possible problems: the compile fails, giving errors involving
cstring.h. This is a g++2.7.0 problem.
A fix for this is in g++-fixes.

b) upon starting XOOPIC, xgrafix reports that it can't find
a tcl/tk initialization file.

Solution: Figure out where the file xgrafix is looking for is,
and fix xgrafix to find it. These are some in particular:
init.tcl in the tcl lib directory, (usually /usr/local/lib/tcl)
init.tk in the tk lib directory, (usually /usr/local/lib/tk)
xgsetup.tcl in your xgrafix directory

If the problem is with finding init.tcl, and init.tk, then probably
these libraries are misinstalled. If xgsetup.tcl is not found,
you probably didn't set XGTCL correctly when building xgrafix.
Double check this and recompile if necessary.

To run,

xoopic -i input/dring.inp

or whatever input file is appropriate for you.




Bugs: email bugreports to xoopic@langmuir.eecs.berkeley.edu
Executing xgrafix/run_conf.sh gives the following warning messages:
Code:

precisiont3400@ubuntu:~/Fusion/XOOPIC/Downloads/xgrafix$ ./run_conf.sh#2
bash: ./run_conf.sh#2: Permission denied
precisiont3400@ubuntu:~/Fusion/XOOPIC/Downloads/xgrafix$ ./run_conf.sh#2
configuring with options: --prefix=/usr/local --with-SCALAR=double --enable-fulloptimize --with-XGRAFIX-lib=/usr/local/lib --with-XGRAFIX-include=/usr/local/include
configure: WARNING: unrecognized options: --with-XGRAFIX-lib, --with-XGRAFIX-include
checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
checking whether build environment is sane... yes
checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... no
checking for mawk... mawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking build system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
checking host system type... x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Using C++ compiler g++
Using C compiler gcc
checking for style of include used by make... GNU
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking for suffix of executables...
checking whether we are cross compiling... no
checking for suffix of object files... o
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... gcc3
checking for library containing strerror... none required
checking whether time.h and sys/time.h may both be included... yes
checking for BSD-compatible nm...
install-sh/usr/bin/nm -B
Setting the flags per system and C++ compiler: g++
checking for g++... /usr/bin/g++
Serial C++ compiler is `g++'
checking g++ version... g++
configure: WARNING: Caution: version  is not known to work.
configure: WARNING: C++ compiler may generate code for this processor only.
checking for -fsquangle... no
checking how to build libraries... with ar cr 
checking for gcc... /usr/bin/gcc
Serial C compiler is `gcc'
checking for gcc... (cached) gcc
checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking for gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached) none needed
checking dependency style of gcc... (cached) gcc3
checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes
checking whether g++ accepts -g... yes
checking dependency style of g++... gcc3
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... g++ -E
checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /bin/grep
checking for egrep... /bin/grep -E
checking for ANSI C header files... yes
checking for sys/types.h... yes
checking for sys/stat.h... yes
checking for stdlib.h... yes
checking for string.h... yes
checking for memory.h... yes
checking for strings.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for size_t... yes
checking whether struct tm is in sys/time.h or time.h... time.h
checking whether c++ compiler supports exception handling... yes
checking whether c++ compiler supports typename... yes
checking whether c++ compiler can explicitly instantiate templates... yes
checking whether c++ compiler supports RTTI... yes
checking whether c++ compiler supports namespaces... yes
checking whether c++ compiler has complex in the namespace std... yes
checking whether c++ compiler has streams in the namespace std... yes
checking whether c++ compiler can overload const type conversions... yes
checking whether c++ compiler knows mutable... yes
checking whether template friends need brackets... yes
checking whether nontype template operators are allowed... no
checking whether static variables can be declared generally... yes
configure: WARNING: Fortran libraries will be invalid.
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... (cached) yes
checking whether ln -s works... yes
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking what the library suffix is... .a
checking how to install libraries... with ${INSTALL} -m 644
configure: WARNING: x11.m4 is obsolete.  Please use AC_PATH_X or AC_PATH_XTRA.
checking for X11/Xlib.h... /usr/include/X11/Xlib.h
checking for libX11.a... no
checking for libX11.so... no
configure: error: Unable to find libX11.a or libX11.so in /usr/lib32:/usr/X11R6/lib:/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib:/lib:/usr/X11/lib:/usr/openwin/lib:/usr/dt/lib:/usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games.  Set the appropriate directory using --with-X11_LIBDIR
precisiont3400@ubuntu:~/Fusion/XOOPIC/Downloads/xgrafix$

The problem seems to be the path name of libX11.a etc. How do I find the pathname? Or how do I avoid the final "configure: error:..." message?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Dr. Joel Rogers, plasma physicist

[ubuntu] Windows 8 and ubuntu on separate harddrives

$
0
0
Hello ubuntu forums,

I thinking about building a new desktop. Conventional wisdom suggests that put both operating systems on one drive,
and use the other drive for storage. My family isn't computer savvy and the grub screen would confuse them. What I was
thinking about was this:Install Windows 8 and Ubuntu on separate drives. Create a usb installion of ubuntu. Use the usb to boot
into the second drive when needed. Well this work?

I have several usb installions of linux, but I've found that they slow down and pause over time. That is why I want a dedicated ubuntu
harddrive.

Thank you in advance.

[all variants] mdadm assembly

$
0
0
After a MoBo failure and upgrade I am trying to get my Arrays back in order.

Not trusting the automatic --assemble --scan... Had a raid assemble wrong before.


Code:

root@this:~# mdadm --examine /dev/sd[g,h,k]1

/dev/sdg1:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 0.90.00

          UUID : 04f02593:86ea8249:bfe78010:bc810f04
  Creation Time : Wed May  2 09:20:26 2012
    Raid Level : raid5
  Used Dev Size : 1953513472 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
    Array Size : 3907026944 (3726.03 GiB 4000.80 GB)
  Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 1


    Update Time : Sat Feb 16 04:37:02 2013
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
      Checksum : c6a11f16 - correct
        Events : 9933

        Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 128K

      Number  Major  Minor  RaidDevice State
this    2      8      81        2      active sync  /dev/sdf1

  0    0      8      97        0      active sync  /dev/sdg1
  1    1      8      145        1      active sync  /dev/sdj1

  2    2      8      81        2      active sync  /dev/sdf1


Code:

/dev/sdh1:
          Magic : a92b4efc

        Version : 0.90.00

          UUID : 04f02593:86ea8249:bfe78010:bc810f04

  Creation Time : Wed May  2 09:20:26 2012

    Raid Level : raid5

  Used Dev Size : 1953513472 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)

    Array Size : 3907026944 (3726.03 GiB 4000.80 GB)

  Raid Devices : 3

  Total Devices : 3

Preferred Minor : 1


    Update Time : Sat Feb 16 04:37:02 2013
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
      Checksum : c6a11f22 - correct
        Events : 9933

        Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 128K

      Number  Major  Minor  RaidDevice State
this    0      8      97        0      active sync  /dev/sdg1

  0    0      8      97        0      active sync  /dev/sdg1
  1    1      8      145        1      active sync  /dev/sdj1
  2    2      8      81        2      active sync  /dev/sdf1


Code:

/dev/sdk1:
          Magic : a92b4efc
        Version : 0.90.00
          UUID : 04f02593:86ea8249:bfe78010:bc810f04
  Creation Time : Wed May  2 09:20:26 2012
    Raid Level : raid5
  Used Dev Size : 1953513472 (1863.02 GiB 2000.40 GB)
    Array Size : 3907026944 (3726.03 GiB 4000.80 GB)
  Raid Devices : 3
  Total Devices : 3
Preferred Minor : 1

    Update Time : Sat Feb 16 04:37:02 2013
          State : clean
 Active Devices : 3
Working Devices : 3
 Failed Devices : 0
  Spare Devices : 0
      Checksum : c6a11f54 - correct
        Events : 9933

        Layout : left-symmetric
    Chunk Size : 128K

      Number  Major  Minor  RaidDevice State
this    1      8      145        1      active sync  /dev/sdj1

  0    0      8      97        0      active sync  /dev/sdg1
  1    1      8      145        1      active sync  /dev/sdj1
  2    2      8      81        2      active sync  /dev/sdf1


Looking at this, am I correct in the assumption I can use the Number to select the correct order of assembly.

Due to a hardware change /dev/sd[g,j,f]1 are obviously referencing the wrong devices (I know this as they are different sized disks to the actual array I bult)

So my Assembly would go something like:

Code:

mdadm --create /dev/md0 --assume-clean --level=5 --metadata=0.9 --chunk=128 --raid-devices=3 /dev/sdh1 /dev/sdk1 /dev/sdg1

[ubuntu] install of ubuntu 12.04 brings me to magenta screen

$
0
0
I first installed 12.10 on a computer with two hard drives, one basically unused. Put ubuntu on that one and installation went well. Then the system upgraded and called for a restart and I couldn't get back in. Got to a command prompt and was able to bring up desktop by typing restore maybe? So decided that maybe 12.10 was too new and installed 12.04 which I have and use on the computer I am on now. After the install I restarted, had it boot from the second drive and all I get is a magenta screen. I did get a series of messages when I tried to get 12.10 to install from the loader saying connect-debounce failed port 2 disabled-don't know if that is related to current problem. Any help appreciated. An update to this-the desktop did finally come up after a series of lines stating the connect-debounce failed -am updating now and hopefully will work on a restart.

[ubuntu] Upgrade to 12.10

$
0
0
I upgraded to 12.1 from 12.04. I would like to know during the process and after upgradation when i opened Synaptic Package Manager, under settings- Repository- Other Software list various files which were disabled while upgrading. Should these files to be deleted or is it to enabled and if so how. :confused: Also attached pic for the same ..
Attached Images

[ubuntu] Dual boot Ubuntu and Puppy using grub2

$
0
0
hi. first, i want to thank all of the moderators and ubuntu community for all the great support given.
second, i should apologize up front for how messed up this post will seem to most who read it.. sorry, i get carried away sometimes.
i have a couple of issues i am trying to solve, and have spent many hrs researching and trying various options, to no avail.
first, i have been trying to get a Puppy frugal install to boot from my Ubuntu supplied grub2 menu, but have not been able to.
was wondering if anyone does this, and if so, how ?

i am pretty sure grub is loaded into the mbr (i think i chose install to sda).
i have added entries in the 40* custom file, but have never been able to boot into Puppy from the grub menu.
"Invalid extent", and "you must first boot linux" are the messages i am getting when trying to boot puppy from grub menu.
puppy boots fine from CD, and it finds the .sfs file on sda6. have the boot files in psubdir puppy5.4.

i have Slacko puppy 5.4 installed in sda6. Ubuntu 12.04 on sda1, and now actually on sda3 as well.
originally i had ubuntu on sda1, but it was a smaller partition with very little freespace, so i copied it to the larger sda3 partition using dd.
if possible i will eventually remove ubuntu from sda1 and use it for something else.
this second problem has to do with update-grub only updates the mbr from the sda1 install. running it from sda3 does not change what i see when booting.
i ran a command that now shows sda3 as the boot partition instead of sda1, but that does not change "who" updates the grub menu.
i also have added a manual entry for ubuntu on sda3 into the 40* file, since the update-grub was mixing uuid's in the grub file it creates.
i shut off the 30 os-prober for now as well. update-grub was giving me both uuid's (from sda1 and sda3) in the menu options it created for sda3, so that's why i shut off the 30 os prober. now i can boot into either ubuntu (sda1 or sda3) without a problem, but still can not get puppy to boot from the grub menu.

The dd copy was done after working with and not being able to boot puppy from grub2, so i don't think that issue has anything to do with puppy not booting.
i do actually get some different error messages than i did before, but i don't have them available right now.. can post later if needed.

thanks for your help.

[ubuntu] Problems loading desktop after upgrading Kernel to 3.8.8

$
0
0
Hi all,
I installed ubuntu 12.10, and due to a driver problem, I got an advice to upgrade my kernel. As I found in internet, the latest stable version was 3.8.8, so I upgraded my kernel to that version

Code:

morpheus@ubuntu:/$ uname -a
Linux ubuntu 3.8.8-030808-generic #201304170248 SMP Wed Apr 17 06:58:01 UTC 2013 i686 i686 i686 GNU/Linux

The problem is, when I rebooted the system, I got a black screen with only [Ok] in the screen. I switched to a tty, logged myself and launched a startx command. My colors were displayed, but the problem is that I think that the desktop thinks my monitor too big for 1280x800....The result is no status bar, no launcher, except the wallpaper....

Any help is appreciated.

Thank you

[ubuntu] Install 12.10 on VAIO

$
0
0
Trying to install 12.10 on a new VAIO SVS13AB1GL

Following the instructions here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFI

Have created a LiveUSB and can boot from it without issue.

When reboot (intending to boot off newly installed hdd) GRUB
comes up with only options to boot off the USB.

FastStartup was disabled (it was a windows 8 machine).

I also tried manually creating partitions on the hdd.

The install always seems to work fine, i can see the installed
files and it all looks good. But upon reboot it only boots from the USB.

I also went through the Boot Repair procedure here:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Boot-Repair

Here's the URL generated by Boot Repair

paste.ubuntu.com/5595767/

Thanks.

[ubuntu] Removing Ubuntu.

$
0
0
Hello people,
Im currently running on Windows 8 and i tried dual booting with Ubuntu (12.10) using the 64Bit desktop installation with EasyDCB, i've used this before on my old laptop (Windows 7) and it worked perfectly.
But.. When i installed it this time i got an error message on boot up and it failed, i then selected to boot from my Windows 8 and i was surprised to see this..ubuntu.jpg
I have 4 Ubuntu's on my boot menu, none of them work and i cannot for the life of me remove them/Ubuntu, i have formatted and removed the partition Ubuntu was on but too no avail..

Also am i installing Ubuntu incorrectly?
Attached Images

[ubuntu] Installing 12.10 on new server and Ubuntu does not detect the hard drives.

$
0
0
Went to install Ubuntu today on a just built server but the install only detects 1 drive. the server has a total of 5 drives 1 is a standard ATA drive and the other 4 are Sata drives. The drive are seen in the bios but not in Ubuntu. The ATA drive is going to be the Operating system and the other 4 I want to configure in a raid array. any suggestion on how to get Ubuntu to detect the other drive?

[lubuntu] Migrating to new hard drive

$
0
0
I am just getting back into using linux after a long absence so I am pretty rusty right now and could use some help or advice. I recently installed lubuntu 12.10 on an old desktop I had kicking around, with the intention of using it as a software development box. It just has a small 40 GB hard drive in it. I realized that I actually had a 160 GB hard drive kicking around and would love to use that instead, so I was wondering how I could go about migrating my /home and installation over to the new drive and increase the size of the partitions. I do not really want to reinstall if possible. I found a few guides, such as: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=599599 but it is pretty old. I was wondering if it is still valid, or if there might be easier methods to accomplish this now.

Anyway, any advice would be really appreciated.

[ubuntu] Ubuntu Won't Boot

$
0
0
I just installed Ubuntu, and installed the recommended Nvidia drivers that popped up. Then, when I rebooted, I choose Ubuntu in Grub, then it shows me a black screen with a flashing small horizontal line, it stays that way for a few seconds, then it flashes some quick text I can't read. Then it goes back to just flashing that little line indefinitely. Any idea what I can do about this?


It's Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit.

[ubuntu] Ubuntu 12.10 dual-boot on ASUS Q500A Windows 8

$
0
0
Hi all,

Before you ask: Yes, I have read various threads, some marked 'SOLVED' and others not, about this topic. I'm merely posting here to ask for a general, guiding rubric on the safest way to install Ubuntu 12.10 alongside a pre-installed Windows 8 on my ASUS Q500A Series machine.

Though I'm pretty tech-savvy, this is my first encounter with both 64-bit technology and UEFI boot systems. I'm a student so I can't really take any major risks.

The initial steps, from my research, seem to both include 1) disabling Secure Boot and 2) making sure that Ubuntu is installed in EFI mode. After this, partitioning the drive appropriately is confusing (Should I have a separate /boot at the beginning of the drive? Does this go underneath the Windows partition, or am I misunderstanding that?).

Hopefully you guys can help shed some light on this. You guys rule.

Best
Ryan

[ubuntu] Epson L200 does not work after upgrade to 12.10

$
0
0
I have upgraded my OS to 12.10. Checking various ends to see if anything is missing. Oops my printer does not respond , tried to send test page print it blinks but does not spool the paper... without printing ... its like half dead.. anybody can revive this please help....

[ubuntu] Black screen after reboot.

$
0
0
Hi guys,

I have a Dell Xps 15 l502x and have been trying to install Ubuntu 12.10 on it for the past few days.

I am installing it via USB and the installation completes successfully, also after the various updates the systems is asking to reboot, I do that and the machine reboots normally without any issues.

After the first reboot after the installation all is fine, the OS is fully functional, after that though when I turn the PC off or just reboot for the second time after the installation the purple screen briefly appears and then the screen turns completely black, it is not projecting the black color it is as if the screen wasn't even turned on, and that's while the machine is still running.

Waiting does nothing, I have completely reinstalled it 2 more times and had the exact same problem, the second reboot after the installation always results in that issue.

Any help would be greatly appreciated, thanks!
Viewing all 26379 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>